GRID NY

Publisher's Watch

Oct 7
Green LEAF, Shocking VOLT. GM Doesn't Get It, Again. Posted By Jonathan A. Schein

This week Nissan North America announced that it will begin taking reservations for its zero-emission electric automobile, LEAF, this coming spring. This is based on strong initial demand, with over 22,000 people contacting the company about the car since it was unveiled in August. A fully charged LEAF can travel up 100 miles at a top speed of 90 miles per hour. It seats 5 and has 5 doors. Most importantly, it does not have a gas engine and has zero tailpipe emissions.

To be sure, not all of the people who've shown initial interest will buy a LEAF. Yet Nissan is literally moving the needle in bringing the next generation of low- and zero-emission vehicles to market. Compare LEAF to Chevrolet's entry into the market with its VOLT. The VOLT still runs on gasoline, getting 230 miles per gallon, and can go no farther than 40 miles after charging— less than half the distance of a fully charged LEAF.

Of course, it's already well known that GM had a fully electric and zero-emission car brought to market back in 1996 with its EV1. No need to go into what happened because there are many culprits that sent that idea to scrap heap. Perhaps it was simple timing that worked against it. However, now that the timing is in any auto manufacturer's favor to bring these new vehicles to a public with a growing demand, one would think that GM would be more advanced than it is. GM has the technology but still is not bringing a fully electric car to market.

And let's talk about the name. LEAF symbolizes green, life, and vitality. VOLT sounds like a punishment. How did WATT not make the grade? Note to GM...you were bailed out with taxpayer money. Now it's time to do better in both technology and branding.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: jeanne mcmanus [Visitor]
You sound right about the technological differences & Chevy's failure to step up to the plate. But I think you're all wrong about the name. "LEAF" sounds weak, fragile and transient (e.g., falling leaf), whereas "VOLT" sounds strong, aggressive and permanent (i.e., once produced, energy cannot be destroyed). Seems to me, the name may be the only thing Chevy got right.
PermalinkPermalink 10/09/09 @ 14:09
Comment from: Chris [Visitor] Email
I think you are way off on GM progress,,, The volts engine is for reserve or back up where as the leaf will leave you stranded. I do not think there battery is going to be as strong as they claim either. "real world testin" gives short term feed back.. the say the estimate a 5 year life!! have fun with that hope your average american can pay it off in four if thats the case.
PermalinkPermalink 12/18/09 @ 12:53

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Previous post: Green Government Is Not a Partisan IssueNext post: Coal? Really?

____________________________________________________
Advertisements

____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
Advertisements
iy2 300x60
____________________________________________________

CONTESTS/COMPETITIONS

Best in Green Building Competition 08
See the innovative & inspiring homes submitted!

____________________________________________________ Advertisements
Feature your release on MGB for only $49.95 thru Flierwire

____________________________________________________